Link Search Menu Expand Document

Supplementary information: Target gene expression levels and competition between transfected and endogenous microRNAs are strong confounding factors in microRNA high-throughput experiments

Takay Saito1 and Pål Sætrom1,2

Citation:
Saito, T and Sætrom, P. Target gene expression levels and competition between transfected and endogenous microRNAs are strong confounding factors in microRNA high-throughput experiments. Silence 3, 3 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-907X-3-3.
Table of contents
  1. Supplementary Tables
    1. Table S1. Summary of miRNA high-throughput experiments.
    2. Table S2. Samples and miRNAs of miRNA high-throughput experiments.
    3. Table S3. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on 5 subgroups of 3’ UTR length.
    4. Table S4. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on 4 subgroups of 3’ UTR conservation.
    5. Table S5. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on 6 subgroups of mRNA expression.
    6. Table S6. P-values of multiple Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests on 5 subgroups of 3’ UTR length.
    7. Table S7. P-values of multiple Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests on 4 subgroups of 3’ UTR conservation.
    8. Table S8. P-values of multiple Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests on 6 subgroups of mRNA expression.
    9. Table S9. Sample level scores of Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on 3’ UTR length.
    10. Table S10. Sample level scores of Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on 3’ UTR conservation.
    11. Table S11. Sample level scores of Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on mRNA expression.
    12. Table S12. The number of genes for four gene groups, T -Endo, T +Endo, NT -Endo, and NT -Endo, per experiment.
    13. Table S13. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests between T -Endo and T +Endo on 5 subgroups of 3’ UTR length.
    14. Table S14. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests between T -Endo and T +Endo on 5 subgroups of 3’ UTR conservation.
    15. Table S15. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests between T -Endo and T +Endo on 5 subgroups of mRNA expression.
    16. Table S16. Comparisons of Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for T -Endo against T +Endo between experimental and individual sample levels.
    17. Table S17. Coefficients and p-values of linear regression with eight factors.
    18. Table S18. Coefficients and p-values of linear regression with eight factors and factor crossing.
    19. Table S19. Coefficients and p-values of linear regression with nine factors.
    20. Table S20. Coefficients and p-values of linear regression with nine factors and factor crossing.
    21. Table S21. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on 3 subgroups of CpG frequency.
    22. Table S22. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on 2 subgroups of developmental genes.
    23. Table S23. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on 2 subgroups of housekeeping genes.
  2. Supplementary Figures
    1. Figure S1. mRNA expression levels from 6 microarray and 2 proteomics experiments.
    2. Figure S2. Log2 enrichment of down-regulated genes compared with all genes mRNA.
    3. Figure S3. Scatter plot of the total tag counts versus total number of miRNA target sites.
    4. Figure S4. Coefficients of a linear regression with eight factors and factor crossing.
    5. Figure S5. Coefficients of a linear regression with nine factors and factor crossing.

Supplementary Tables

Table S1. Summary of miRNA high-throughput experiments.

Experiment # of unique miRNAs # of samples Type *
Baek MA 3 3 M
Baek 3 3 P
Lim 7 14 M
Jackson 26 66 M
Linsley 9 23 M
Linsley OME 2 2 M_OME
Grimson 9 18 M
Selbach LNA 1 1 P_LNA
Selbach MA 5 5 M
Selbach 5 5 P
  • Type: types of experiments as Micrroarray overexpression (M), Proteomics overexpression (P), Microarray inhibition (M_OME), and Proteomics inhibition (P_LNA).letter-spacing

Table S2. Samples and miRNAs of miRNA high-throughput experiments.

Experiment Sample ID * Internal miRNA ID
Baek MA baek_m_mir_1 baek_m_mir_1
Baek MA baek_m_mir_124 baek_m_mir_124
Baek MA baek_m_mir_181 baek_m_mir_181
Baek baek_p_mir_1 baek_p_mir_1
Baek baek_p_mir_124 baek_p_mir_124
Baek baek_p_mir_181 baek_p_mir_181
Lim GSM37602 mirna-lim2005-chimiR-1/124
Lim GSM37603 mirna-lim2005-chimiR-1/124
Lim GSM37604 mirna-lim2005-chimiR-124/1
Lim GSM37605 mirna-lim2005-chimiR-124/1
Lim GSM37598 mirna-lim2005-miR-1
Lim GSM37599 mirna-lim2005-miR-1
Lim GSM37600 mirna-lim2005-miR-124
Lim GSM37601 mirna-lim2005-miR-124
Lim GSM37606 mirna-lim2005-miR-124mut5-6
Lim GSM37607 mirna-lim2005-miR-124mut5-6
Lim GSM37608 mirna-lim2005-miR-124mut9-10
Lim GSM37609 mirna-lim2005-miR-124mut9-10
Lim GSM37610 mirna-lim2005-miR-373
Lim GSM37611 mirna-lim2005-miR-373
Jackson GSM133702 sirna-jackson2006wso-1
Jackson GSM134468 sirna-jackson2006wso-1
Jackson GSM133701 sirna-jackson2006wso-10
Jackson GSM134485 sirna-jackson2006wso-10
Jackson GSM134508 sirna-jackson2006wso-10
Jackson GSM133700 sirna-jackson2006wso-11
Jackson GSM134484 sirna-jackson2006wso-11
Jackson GSM134507 sirna-jackson2006wso-11
Jackson GSM134483 sirna-jackson2006wso-12
Jackson GSM134506 sirna-jackson2006wso-12
Jackson GSM133699 sirna-jackson2006wso-13
Jackson GSM134482 sirna-jackson2006wso-13
Jackson GSM134505 sirna-jackson2006wso-13
Jackson GSM133698 sirna-jackson2006wso-14
Jackson GSM134481 sirna-jackson2006wso-14
Jackson GSM134504 sirna-jackson2006wso-14
Jackson GSM133697 sirna-jackson2006wso-15
Jackson GSM134480 sirna-jackson2006wso-15
Jackson GSM134503 sirna-jackson2006wso-15
Jackson GSM133696 sirna-jackson2006wso-16
Jackson GSM134479 sirna-jackson2006wso-16
Jackson GSM134502 sirna-jackson2006wso-16
Jackson GSM133695 sirna-jackson2006wso-17
Jackson GSM134478 sirna-jackson2006wso-17
Jackson GSM134501 sirna-jackson2006wso-17
Jackson GSM133686 sirna-jackson2006wso-18
Jackson GSM134477 sirna-jackson2006wso-18
Jackson GSM134500 sirna-jackson2006wso-18
Jackson GSM133694 sirna-jackson2006wso-19
Jackson GSM134476 sirna-jackson2006wso-19
Jackson GSM134499 sirna-jackson2006wso-19
Jackson GSM133685 sirna-jackson2006wso-20
Jackson GSM134475 sirna-jackson2006wso-20
Jackson GSM134498 sirna-jackson2006wso-20
Jackson GSM133693 sirna-jackson2006wso-21
Jackson GSM134474 sirna-jackson2006wso-21
Jackson GSM134497 sirna-jackson2006wso-21
Jackson GSM133692 sirna-jackson2006wso-22
Jackson GSM134473 sirna-jackson2006wso-22
Jackson GSM134496 sirna-jackson2006wso-22
Jackson GSM133691 sirna-jackson2006wso-23
Jackson GSM134472 sirna-jackson2006wso-23
Jackson GSM134495 sirna-jackson2006wso-23
Jackson GSM133690 sirna-jackson2006wso-24
Jackson GSM134471 sirna-jackson2006wso-24
Jackson GSM134494 sirna-jackson2006wso-24
Jackson GSM133687 sirna-jackson2006wso-25
Jackson GSM134470 sirna-jackson2006wso-25
Jackson GSM134493 sirna-jackson2006wso-25
Jackson GSM133684 sirna-jackson2006wso-26
Jackson GSM134469 sirna-jackson2006wso-26
Jackson GSM134492 sirna-jackson2006wso-26
Jackson GSM134467 sirna-jackson2006wso-27
Jackson GSM134466 sirna-jackson2006wso-28
Jackson GSM134488 sirna-jackson2006wso-30
Jackson GSM134491 sirna-jackson2006wso-31
Jackson GSM134511 sirna-jackson2006wso-4
Jackson GSM134512 sirna-jackson2006wso-5
Jackson GSM133688 sirna-jackson2006wso-7
Jackson GSM134487 sirna-jackson2006wso-7
Jackson GSM134489 sirna-jackson2006wso-7
Jackson GSM134510 sirna-jackson2006wso-7
Jackson GSM133689 sirna-jackson2006wso-8
Jackson GSM134486 sirna-jackson2006wso-8
Jackson GSM134490 sirna-jackson2006wso-8
Jackson GSM134509 sirna-jackson2006wso-8
Linsley GSM156557 mirna-linsley2007-let-7c
Linsley GSM156558 mirna-linsley2007-let-7c
Linsley GSM156544 mirna-linsley2007-miR-103
Linsley GSM156580 mirna-linsley2007-miR-103
Linsley GSM156523 mirna-linsley2007-miR-15a
Linsley GSM156545 mirna-linsley2007-miR-15a
Linsley GSM156549 mirna-linsley2007-miR-15a
Linsley GSM156577 mirna-linsley2007-miR-15a
Linsley GSM156522 mirna-linsley2007-miR-16
Linsley GSM156546 mirna-linsley2007-miR-16
Linsley GSM156550 mirna-linsley2007-miR-16
Linsley GSM156579 mirna-linsley2007-miR-16
Linsley GSM156553 mirna-linsley2007-miR-17-5p
Linsley GSM156555 mirna-linsley2007-miR-17-5p
Linsley GSM156547 mirna-linsley2007-miR-192
Linsley GSM156551 mirna-linsley2007-miR-192
Linsley GSM156554 mirna-linsley2007-miR-20
Linsley GSM156556 mirna-linsley2007-miR-20
Linsley GSM156548 mirna-linsley2007-miR-215
Linsley GSM156552 mirna-linsley2007-miR-215
Linsley GSM156524 mirna-linsley2007_miR_106b
Linsley GSM156543 mirna-linsley2007_miR_106b
Linsley GSM156576 mirna-linsley2007_miR_106b
Linsley OME GSM155603 mirna-linsley2007OME-miR-16
Linsley OME GSM155605 mirna-linsley2007OME_miR_106b
Grimson GSM210900 mirna-grimson2007-miR-122a
Grimson GSM210901 mirna-grimson2007-miR-122a
Grimson GSM210902 mirna-grimson2007-miR-128a
Grimson GSM210903 mirna-grimson2007-miR-128a
Grimson GSM210904 mirna-grimson2007-miR-132
Grimson GSM210905 mirna-grimson2007-miR-132
Grimson GSM210906 mirna-grimson2007-miR-133a
Grimson GSM210907 mirna-grimson2007-miR-133a
Grimson GSM210908 mirna-grimson2007-miR-142-3p
Grimson GSM210909 mirna-grimson2007-miR-142-3p
Grimson GSM210910 mirna-grimson2007-miR-148a
Grimson GSM210911 mirna-grimson2007-miR-148a
Grimson GSM210912 mirna-grimson2007-miR-181a
Grimson GSM210913 mirna-grimson2007-miR-181a
Grimson GSM210896 mirna-grimson2007-miR-7
Grimson GSM210897 mirna-grimson2007-miR-7
Grimson GSM210898 mirna-grimson2007-miR-9
Grimson GSM210899 mirna-grimson2007-miR-9
Selbach LNA psilac_p_let_7 psilac_p_let_7
Selbach MA psilac_m_let_7_oe psilac_m_let_7_oe
Selbach MA psilac_m_mir1 psilac_m_mir1
Selbach MA psilac_m_mir155 psilac_m_mir155
Selbach MA psilac_m_mir16 psilac_m_mir16
Selbach MA psilac_m_mir30 psilac_m_mir30
Selbach psilac_p_let_7_oe psilac_p_let_7_oe
Selbach psilac_p_mir1 psilac_p_mir1
Selbach psilac_p_mir155 psilac_p_mir155
Selbach psilac_p_mir16 psilac_p_mir16
Selbach psilac_p_mir30 psilac_p_mir30
  • Sample ID: GEO Sample IDs for microarray experiments. Sample IDs are equivalent with Internal miRNA IDs for Baek MA, Baek, Selbach LNA, Selbach MA, and Selbach.

Table S3. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on 5 subgroups of 3’ UTR length.

Experiment Very Long Long Med Long Med Short Short
Grimson 1 0.0001097** 1.49E-06** 0.9987 0.877
Linsley 1 1 1.34E-14** 0.0001561** 1.47E-08**
Lim 1 1 2.53E-08** 4.02E-17** 0.001384*
Jackson 1 0.9861 5.66E-07** 2.98E-09** 0.02786*
Baek 0.6108 0.4996 0.6649 0.1129 0.7686
Selbach 0.9963 0.9267 0.1218 0.005917* 0.0206*
Baek MA 1 0.9988 0.0001289** 1.43E-11** 0.01611*
Selbach MA 1 0.3123 0.002443* 0.004716* 0.3854
Selbach LNA 0.4236 0.2408 0.9639 0.1824 0.4064
Linsley OME 0.998 0.7781 0.004476* 0.2858 0.4708

Lower p-values indicate that a set of genes in one sub-group is more down-regulated than a set of genes in the rest of subgroups. “*” and “**” are added when the p-value is less than 0.05 and Sidak adjusted (n=50) 0.001, respectively.


Table S4. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on 4 subgroups of 3’ UTR conservation.

Experiment High Medium Low NoConsv
Grimson 3.18E-91** 1.73E-05** 1 1
Linsley 1.54E-140** 9.71E-09** 1 1
Lim 0.9605 1 0.7262 1.68E-12**
Jackson 2.00E-14** 0.442 0.9999 0.9971
Baek 0.4501 0.06762 0.9964 0.1565
Selbach 0.04254* 0.7226 0.5001 0.8695
Baek MA 0.5789 0.9598 0.8468 0.003194*
Selbach MA 6.11E-11** 0.003409* 1 0.9809
Selbach LNA 0.07027 0.9596 0.02426* 0.9181
Linsley OME 0.9973 0.09355 0.2657 0.2918

Lower p-values indicate that a set of genes in one sub-group is more down-regulated than a set of genes in the rest of subgroups. “*” and “**” are added when the p-value is less than 0.05 and Sidak adjusted (n=40) 0.0013, respectively.


Table S5. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on 6 subgroups of mRNA expression.

Experiment Very High High Medium Low Very Low NoExp
Grimson 2.42E-90** 8.74E-62** 8.63E-20** 0.007846* 1 1
Linsley† 4.98E-143** 3.67E-91** 5.32E-44** 0.9826 1 1
Lim 1.51E-26** 0.003186* 0.2223 0.9964 1 1
Jackson 1.83E-50** 6.25E-12** 0.06033 0.001487* 1 1
Baek 0.1497 0.1157 0.9956 0.1983 0.9733 0.534
Selbach 0.4526 0.8428 0.1576 0.03415* 0.9953 0.9641
Baek MA 4.62E-23** 0.00139* 7.83E-06** 0.3092 0.9998 1
Selbach MA 2.94E-27** 1.49E-07** 0.0004135** 0.9689 1 1
Selbach LNA 0.9988 0.3202 0.1359 0.01038* 0.2094 0.615
Linsley OME 0.06633 1.30E-11** 6.57E-06** 2.07E-09** 1 1

Lower p-values indicate that a set of genes in one sub-group is more down-regulated than a set of genes in the rest of subgroups. “*” and “**” are added when the p-value is less than 0.05 and Sidak adjusted (n=60) 0.00086, respectively.

† The expression levels were measured for the HeLa cells, but some other cell line was used in the Linsley experiment. It is included only for comparison purpose.


Table S6. P-values of multiple Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests on 5 subgroups of 3’ UTR length.

Experiment Very Long Long Med Long Med Short Short
Grimson 0.9916 1.44E-06** 0.0001501** 0.3243 0.04871*
Linsley 0.9712 0.9938 1.19E-15** 0.0001545** 6.07E-06**
Lim 0.971 0.9478 4.99E-06** 1.25E-14** 0.0001177**
Jackson 0.9979 0.848 1.12E-05** 1.99E-06** 0.001449*
Baek 0.4815 0.683 0.8718 0.2318 0.488
Selbach 0.9702 0.6291 0.2414 0.01213* 0.06909
Baek MA 0.9893 0.9797 0.0002018** 4.00E-08** 0.02661*
Selbach MA 0.9962 0.35 0.0002901** 0.0005103** 0.1217
Selbach LNA 0.7271 0.2991 0.9337 0.1318 0.4176
Linsley OME 0.9239 0.4324 0.01998* 0.1771 0.3337

Lower p-values indicate that a set of genes in one sub-group is more down-regulated than a set of genes in the rest of subgroups. “*” and “**” are added when the p-value is less than 0.05 and Sidak adjusted (n=50) 0.001, respectively.


Table S7. P-values of multiple Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests on 4 subgroups of 3’ UTR conservation.

Experiment High Medium Low NoConsv
Grimson 5.73E-92** 8.36E-07** 0.9862 0.9883
Linsley 4.24E-128** 2.31E-13** 0.9771 0.9449
Lim 0.01429* 0.9909 0.5264 9.28E-18**
Jackson 8.90E-21** 0.01791* 0.5197 0.1588
Baek 0.3584 0.04377* 0.9078 0.3234
Selbach 0.07206 0.9122 0.6764 0.9017
Baek MA 0.503 0.9653 0.8533 0.002383*
Selbach MA 1.01E-09** 0.001672* 1 0.479
Selbach LNA 0.02364* 0.9725 0.08733 0.8624
Linsley OME 0.9865 0.05635 0.358 0.05104

Lower p-values indicate that a set of genes in one sub-group is more down-regulated than a set of genes in the rest of subgroups. “*” and “**” are added when the p-value is less than 0.05 and Sidak adjusted (n=40) 0.0013, respectively.


Table S8. P-values of multiple Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests on 6 subgroups of mRNA expression.

Experiment Very High High Medium Low Very Low NoExp
Grimson 4.40E-88** 1.64E-57** 1.73E-20** 3.10E-05** 0.9806 0.8833
Linsley† 2.83E-155** 1.57E-115** 1.00E-50** 0.345 0.997 0.1561
Lim 2.53E-19** 0.002125* 0.001156* 0.9981 0.8145 0.9976
Jackson 3.03E-50** 1.33E-17** 2.40E-05** 0.0002529** 0.9815 0.1539
Baek 0.14 0.1617 0.985 0.2345 0.7886 0.5328
Selbach 0.06506 0.8938 0.2683 0.0112* 1 0.7825
Baek MA 5.61E-19** 0.001805* 2.06E-05** 0.06406 0.9993 1
Selbach MA 2.26E-29** 6.36E-12** 1.94E-09** 0.09846 0.8288 0.001052*
Selbach LNA 0.9962 0.5803 0.08177 0.02633* 0.387 0.6022
Linsley OME 0.007603* 7.60E-13** 1.11E-08** 2.67E-09** 0.6525 0.1083

Lower p-values indicate that a set of genes in one sub-group is more down-regulated than a set of genes in the rest of subgroups. “*” and “**” are added when the p-value is less than 0.05 and Sidak adjusted (n=60) 0.00086, respectively.

† The expression levels were measured for the HeLa cells, but some other cell line was used in the Linsley experiment. It is included only for comparison purpose.


Table S9. Sample level scores of Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on 3’ UTR length.

Experiment Very Long Long Med Long Med Short Short
Grimson 0.06* 0.39* 0.39* 0.17* 0.06*
Linsley 0 0.17* 0.57* 0.39* 0.35*
Lim 0 0 0.63** 0.63** 0.38*
Jackson 0 0 0.21* 0.39* 0.12*
Baek 0 0 0 0 0
Selbach 0 0 0 0.2* 0.2*
Baek MA 0 0 0.33* 1** 0.33*
Selbach MA 0 0.2* 0.6** 0.6** 0.2*
Selbach LNA 0 0 0 0 0
Linsley OME 0 0 0.5* 0 0

We performed the same Wilcoxon rank-sum tests as in Table S3 on samples instead of experiments. We then counted the number of samples that had a significant p-value (<0.05) to calculate the proportion per experiment as Sample level score. “*” and “**” are added when the score is between 0 and 0.5, and >0.5, respectively.


Table S10. Sample level scores of Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on 3’ UTR conservation.

Experiment High Medium Low NoConsv
Grimson 0.94** 0.22* 0 0
Linsley 0.83** 0.3* 0 0.09*
Lim 0.25* 0 0 0.5*
Jackson 0.42* 0 0.06* 0.03*
Baek 0 0.33* 0 0
Selbach 0 0 0 0
Baek MA 0 0 0 0.33*
Selbach MA 0.8** 0.6** 0 0.2*
Selbach LNA 0 0 1** 0
Linsley OME 0 0 0.5* 0

We performed the same Wilcoxon rank-sum tests as in Table S4 on samples instead of experiments. We then counted the number of samples that had a significant p-value (<0.05) to calculate the proportion per experiment as Sample level score. “*” and “**” are added when the score is between 0 and 0.5, and >0.5, respectively.


Table S11. Sample level scores of Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on mRNA expression.

Experiment Very High High Medium Low Very Low NoExp
Grimson 0.83** 0.89** 0.5* 0.33* 0 0
Linsley† 1** 1** 0.91** 0.09* 0 0
Lim 0.88** 0.13* 0.25* 0 0 0
Jackson 0.67** 0.48* 0.06* 0.18* 0 0
Baek 0 0 0 0 0 0
Selbach 0.2* 0 0.2* 0.2* 0 0
Baek MA 1** 0.67** 0.67** 0.33* 0 0
Selbach MA 0.6** 0.8** 0.6** 0.2* 0 0
Selbach LNA 0 0 0 1** 0 0
Linsley OME 0.5* 1** 1** 1** 0 0

We performed the same Wilcoxon rank-sum tests as in Table S5 on samples instead of experiments. We then counted the number of samples that had a significant p-value (<0.05) to calculate the proportion per experiment as Sample level score. “*” and “**” are added when the score is between 0 and 0.5, and >0.5, respectively.

† The expression levels were measured for the HeLa cells, but some other cell line was used in the Linsley experiment. It is included only for comparison purpose.


Table S12. The number of genes for four gene groups, T -Endo, T +Endo, NT -Endo, and NT -Endo, per experiment.

Experiment T -Endo T +Endo NT -Endo NT +Endo
Grimson 5103 35367 169623 244605
Linsley 1035 57458 222226 300284
Lim 1080 8026 76576 116406
Jackson 1987 12846 318344 500436
Baek 129 728 28992 45934
Selbach 95 1911 48440 75859
Baek MA 834 6444 28287 40218
Selbach MA 766 15518 47769 62252
Selbach LNA 0 280 9707 15274
Linsley OME 0 6388 19414 24720

Table S13. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests between T -Endo and T +Endo on 5 subgroups of 3’ UTR length.

Experiment Very Long Long Med Long Med Short Short
Grimson - 0.004507* 0.9984 0.9912 0.5245
Linsley† - 0.0178* 0.9859 0.4187 0.6971
Lim - 3.10E-05** 0.2057 0.1298 0.1892
Jackson - 0.7745 0.2359 0.9576 0.3405
Baek - 0.1639 0.5665 0.7491 0.758
Selbach - 0.1493 0.005243* 0.1131 0.3542
Baek MA - 0.9775 0.915 0.2142 0.8701
Selbach MA - 0.6107 0.8524 0.7769 0.481
Selbach LNA†† - - - - -
Linsley OME†† - - - - -

Lower p-values indicate that a set of T -Endo genes is more down-regulated than T +Endo genes. “*” and “**” are added when the p-value is less than 0.05 and Sidak adjusted (n=50) 0.001, respectively.

† Endogenous miRNAs of the HeLa cells were used to determine if a gene was influenced by any endogenous miRNAs or not (see the Methods). Although some other cell line was used in the Linsley experiment, it is included only for comparison purpose.

†† Two inhibition experiments, Selbach LNA and Linsley OME, were excluded as they inhibited endogenous miRNAs in the HeLa cells.


Table S14. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests between T -Endo and T +Endo on 5 subgroups of 3’ UTR conservation.

Experiment High Medium Low NoConsv
Grimson 0.7221 0.3305 0.6551 0.8161
Linsley† 0.2087 0.4459 0.3561 0.06864
Lim 6.97E-07** 1.29E-07** 0.003608* 0.002016*
Jackson 0.01399* 0.004478* 0.0434* 0.02414*
Baek 0.6602 0.3803 0.6538 0.2719
Selbach 0.03193* 0.01232* 0.03732* 0.02471*
Baek MA 0.2123 0.1387 0.02438* 0.1335
Selbach MA 0.2798 0.4313 0.6804 0.5433
Selbach LNA†† - - - -
Linsley OME†† - - - -

Lower p-values indicate that a set of T -Endo genes is more down-regulated than T +Endo genes. “*” and “**” are added when the p-value is less than 0.05 and Sidak adjusted (n=40) 0.0013, respectively.

† Endogenous miRNAs of the HeLa cells were used to determine if a gene was influenced by any endogenous miRNAs or not (see the Methods). Although some other cell line was used in the Linsley experiment, it is included only for comparison purpose.

†† Two inhibition experiments, Selbach LNA and Linsley OME, were excluded as they inhibited endogenous miRNAs in the HeLa cells.


Table S15. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests between T -Endo and T +Endo on 5 subgroups of mRNA expression.

Experiment Very High High Medium Low Very Low NoExp
Grimson 0.2563 0.1928 0.8973 0.6207 0.7154 0.592
Linsley† 0.3367 0.6569 3.69E-06** 0.7857 0.7779 0.6635
Lim 4.81E-07** 1.98E-08** 0.0009558* 0.0001625** 0.1774 0.5799
Jackson 0.02235* 0.007227* 0.0005593** 0.05376 0.9965 0.1031
Baek 0.5206 0.1892 0.6363 0.7 0.5663 0.9338
Selbach 0.0009269* 0.003826* 0.4585 0.3507 0.2129 0.5656
Baek MA 0.03596* 0.0002753** 0.4101 0.526 0.1314 0.2536
Selbach MA 0.1056 0.4117 0.04419* 0.649 0.9644 0.8361
Selbach LNA†† - - - - - -
Linsley OME†† - - - - - -

Lower p-values indicate that a set of T -Endo genes is more down-regulated than T +Endo genes. “*” and “**” are added when the p-value is less than 0.05 and Sidak adjusted (n=60) 0.00086, respectively.

† Endogenous miRNAs of the HeLa cells were used to determine if a gene was influenced by any endogenous miRNAs or not (see the Methods). Although some other cell line was used in the Linsley experiment, it is included only for comparison purpose.

†† Two inhibition experiments, Selbach LNA and Linsley OME, were excluded as they inhibited endogenous miRNAs in the HeLa cells.


Table S16. Comparisons of Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for T -Endo against T +Endo between experimental and individual sample levels.

Factor Subgroup Expr Smpl (>0.0) Smpl (>0.5)
3' UTR Length Very Long 0 0 0
Long 3 3 0
Med Long 1 2 0
Med Short 0 2 0
Short 0 3 0
3' UTR Cosv High 3 2 0
Medium 3 6 1
Low 4 4 1
NoConsv 3 5 0
mRNA Exp Very High 4 6 0
High 4 5 1
Medium 4 4 0
Low 1 3 0
Very Low 0 1 0
NoExp 0 3 0

Expr: the number of experiments that have significant p-value. Smpl: the number of experiments that have Sample level scores greater than either 0.0 (>0.0) or 0.5 (>0.5).


Table S17. Coefficients and p-values of linear regression with eight factors.

Feature Coef P-value -log10p
ln3 -0.01152 4.86E-60 59.31368
cs3 0.009677 3.36E-119 118.4739
exp 0.018357 0 140
#site_m 0.094099 0 140
#endo_m -0.00423 2.70E-05 4.568619
#site_s -0.0043 5.06E-31 30.29572
p_ma 0.000495 0.348526 0.457764
e_oe 0.004469 4.56E-37 36.34077

Table S18. Coefficients and p-values of linear regression with eight factors and factor crossing.

Feature Coef P-value -log10p
ln3 -2.83E-06 1.22E-05 4.915007242
cs3 -0.015803897 1.18E-05 4.928955818
exp -0.001124219 0.000303687 3.517574008
#site_m 0.25684395 2.13E-29 28.67115985
#endo_m 0.020685808 0.026462549 1.577368322
#site_s -0.096087846 0.000458275 3.338874297
p_ma -0.019081989 0.080483278 1.094294345
e_oe 0.00727338 0.000852402 3.069355424
ln3:cs3 3.94E-07 0.490734868 0.309153084
ln3:exp -2.84E-07 2.14E-18 17.66958993
ln3:#site_m 1.48E-06 0.176921334 0.752219795
ln3:#endo_m 1.84E-06 1.44E-16 15.84103519
ln3:#site_s 8.68E-07 0.026250076 1.580869438
ln3:p_ma -4.69E-07 0.401187569 0.396652532
ln3:e_oe -5.09E-07 0.178249045 0.748972789
cs3:exp 7.59E-05 0.672276785 0.172451885
cs3:#site_m 0.10223823 5.02E-08 7.29904158
cs3:#endo_m -0.027518299 0.000143836 3.842131652
cs3:#site_s 0.011775068 3.25E-06 5.487463689
cs3:p_ma 0.002299274 0.416319908 0.380572821
cs3:e_oe 0.015830659 1.05E-10 9.977852179
exp:#site_m 0.00899945 1.53E-16 15.81588578
exp:#endo_m 0.000936208 0.041409029 1.382904954
exp:#site_s -0.000496407 0.002085615 2.680765791
exp:p_ma 0.001429897 2.42E-07 6.61563286
exp:e_oe 0.001102657 2.24E-12 11.64989917
#site_m:#endo_m -0.221894438 5.61E-45 44.25103531
#site_m:#site_s 0.013159268 0.402069013 0.395699396
#site_m:p_ma -0.131376751 3.87E-10 9.412586394
#site_m:e_oe 0.073734522 1.98E-10 9.703068939
#endo_m:#site_s -0.001134625 0.84371691 0.073803247
#endo_m:p_ma 0.000400551 0.95883541 0.018255936
#endo_m:e_oe -0.008580668 0.145104296 0.838319728
#site_s:p_ma 0.119877581 5.62E-08 7.250318802
#site_s:e_oe -0.035683116 0.027884011 1.554644753
p_ma:e_oe 0.024313262 0.024118046 1.617657876

Table S19. Coefficients and p-values of linear regression with nine factors.

Feature Coef Pvalue -log10p
ln3 -0.00641 3.80E-20 19.42014
cs3 0.004361 1.15E-25 24.93794
exp 0.018288 0 140
#site_m 0.012595 1.04E-06 5.98222
#endo_m -0.00441 8.56E-06 5.06752
#site_s -0.00574 1.47E-55 54.83402
p_ma 0.001759 0.000711 3.147907
e_oe 0.004158 2.35E-33 32.62969
ts_score 0.076813 0 140

Table S20. Coefficients and p-values of linear regression with nine factors and factor crossing.

Feature Coef Pvalue -log10p
ln3 -1.60E-06 0.011925824 1.923511595
cs3 -0.008366786 0.019318299 1.714031125
exp -0.001568955 2.59E-07 6.586048885
#site_m 0.159028884 4.01E-10 9.396500422
#endo_m 0.009391765 0.304168389 0.516885922
#site_s -0.097095613 0.000295034 3.530128515
p_ma -0.012706529 0.239896623 0.619975865
e_oe 0.003253876 0.128033499 0.892676387
ts_score 0.065575654 7.32E-12 11.13573822
ln3:cs3 9.99E-07 0.079045994 1.102120133
ln3:exp -2.48E-07 8.53E-15 14.06908328
ln3:#site_m 2.51E-06 0.04108057 1.386363539
ln3:#endo_m 7.29E-07 0.000920571 3.035942721
ln3:#site_s 7.57E-07 0.047937352 1.319325957
ln3:p_ma -2.36E-07 0.665962223 0.176550406
ln3:e_oe -1.89E-07 0.609903477 0.214738891
ln3:ts_score -9.05E-06 8.39E-19 18.07603485
cs3:exp -0.000210957 0.234127943 0.630546751
cs3:#site_m 0.063088756 0.003621569 2.44110321
cs3:#endo_m -0.030869619 1.57E-05 4.804938386
cs3:#site_s 0.011989538 1.74E-06 5.758989552
cs3:p_ma -0.000515518 0.853673874 0.06870801
cs3:e_oe 0.011256547 3.69E-06 5.433102786
cs3:ts_score -0.056098519 1.49E-14 13.82670741
exp:#site_m 0.002073852 0.075893396 1.119796014
exp:#endo_m 0.001163854 0.009384581 2.027585129
exp:#site_s -0.000576086 0.000255828 3.592052003
exp:p_ma 0.001497452 3.07E-08 7.512962288
exp:e_oe 0.001052792 6.52E-12 11.18585865
exp:ts_score 0.008284526 3.99E-66 65.39935915
#site_m:#endo_m -0.050965831 0.001854836 2.731694567
#site_m:#site_s 0.079648242 1.72E-06 5.764690568
#site_m:p_ma -0.182652224 8.11E-15 14.0911118
#site_m:e_oe 0.011835961 0.335633255 0.474135015
#site_m:ts_score -0.016918648 0.320827576 0.49372831
#endo_m:#site_s -0.00650073 0.248378993 0.604885138
#endo_m:p_ma 0.003415606 0.652117952 0.185673844
#endo_m:e_oe -0.008238802 0.151727348 0.818936132
#endo_m:ts_score 0.044847948 0.00152743 2.8160388
#site_s:p_ma 0.110263074 2.75E-07 6.561220289
#site_s:e_oe -0.027099317 0.091634949 1.037938855
#site_s:ts_score -0.035149695 8.23E-08 7.084730455
p_ma:e_oe 0.019092069 0.073869883 1.13153259
p_ma:ts_score 0.04113798 8.56E-07 6.067689011
e_oe:ts_score 0.06617109 2.56E-33 32.59133846

Table S21. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on 3 subgroups of CpG frequency.

Experiment High Med Low
Grimson 4.84E-27** 1.60E-05** 1
Linsley 1.44E-115** 0.8724 1
Lim 0.001451** 0.3292 1
Jackson 4.49E-14** 0.01002* 1
Baek 0.1548 0.9116 0.283
Selbach 0.7002 0.1597 0.8271
Baek MA 0.005732* 0.04945* 1
Selbach MA 0.001856* 0.0005601** 1
Selbach LNA 0.4183 0.6502 0.3786
Linsley OME 5.89E-08** 0.8315 1

Lower p-values indicate that a set of genes in one sub-group is more down-regulated than a set of genes in the rest of subgroups. “*” and “**” are added when the p-value is less than 0.05 and Sidak adjusted (n=30) 0.0017, respectively.


Table S22. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on 2 subgroups of developmental genes.

Experiment Dev NonDev
Grimson 0.9961 0.003889*
Linsley 0.9917 0.008313*
Lim 0.966 0.03401*
Jackson 0.9988 0.001185**
Baek 0.05068 0.9494
Selbach 0.09926 0.9008
Baek MA 0.7844 0.2156
Selbach MA 2.74E-05** 1
Selbach LNA 0.4256 0.5751
Linsley OME 0.8274 0.1726

Lower p-values indicate that a set of genes in one sub-group is more down-regulated than a set of genes in the rest of subgroups. “*” and “**” are added when the p-value is less than 0.05 and Sidak adjusted (n=20) 0.0026, respectively.


Table S23. P-values of multiple Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on 2 subgroups of housekeeping genes.

Experiment HK NonHK
Grimson 2.93E-06** 1
Linsley 1.67E-08** 1
Lim 0.0001003** 0.9999
Jackson 1.62E-06** 1
Baek 0.7208 0.2794
Selbach 0.876 0.1241
Baek MA 0.07838 0.9216
Selbach MA 0.09997 0.9
Selbach LNA 0.1272 0.8733
Linsley OME 0.9771 0.02288*

Lower p-values indicate that a set of genes in one sub-group is more down-regulated than a set of genes in the rest of subgroups. “*” and “**” are added when the p-value is less than 0.05 and Sidak adjusted (n=20) 0.0026, respectively.


Supplementary Figures

 

Figure S1

Figure S1. mRNA expression levels from 6 microarray and 2 proteomics experiments.

We calculated the ratios of tag counts of RNASeq for each sub-group relative to the total counts for 6 microarray (A-G) and 2 proteomics (G and H) experiments. The experiment data were divided into four by exogenous miRNA targets (T) and non-targets (NT), as well as endogenous miRNA targets (+E) and non-targets (-E).

* Endogenous miRNAs of the HeLa cells were used to determine if a gene was influenced by any endogenous miRNAs or not (see the Methods). Although some other cell line was used in the Linsley experiment, it is included only for comparison purpose.

† As two inhibition experiments, Selbach LNA and Linsley OME, inhibited endogenous miRNAs in the HeLa cells, there were no genes categorized as T -Endo.


 

Figure S2

Figure S2. Log2 enrichment of down-regulated genes compared with all genes mRNA.

Scatter plots show log2 enrichment of down-regulated genes compared with all genes for the six sub-groups of mRNA expression levels in all studied datasets subdivided by predicted exogenous and endogenous miRNA targeting. Lines and shaded grays show respectively linear fits and standard errors for the microarray (red dots) and proteomics (blue triangles) experiments; p-values (lower left) are unadjusted p-values from Pearson correlation tests. Data points based on a single gene were excluded. The regression lines show that in the microarray but not the proteomics experiments, down-regulated genes are enriched among highly expressed genes and that this enrichment depends on gene expression levels.


 

Figure S3

Figure S3. Scatter plot of the total tag counts versus total number of miRNA target sites.

We plotted a scatter plots to check the correlation between mRNA expression level and the number of miRNA target sites. The plot shows the total tag counts and the total number of miRNA target sites from 67 samples with 32 miRNAs and 35 siRNAs. The line was drawn by Pearson’s correlation (r = 0.973 and p 2.2e-16). Only the samples assayed in HeLa were included. Red circles represent miRNAs, whereas blue triangles represent siRNAs.


 

Figure S4

Figure S4. Coefficients of a linear regression with eight factors and factor crossing.

The dot plot shows the coefficients of the liner model with formula: -logratio = (ln3 + cs3 + exp + #site_m + #endo_m + #site_s + p_ma + e_oe)^2. The ^ operator extracts all eight factors as well as all possible combinations of second order interactions, such as ln3 * cs3 (ln3:cs3), ln3 * exp (ln3:exp), and so on. The size of dots indicates -log10p as the negation of the logarithm of p-values to base 10. Positive coefficients associate with miRNA down-regulation.


 

Figure S5

Figure S5. Coefficients of a linear regression with nine factors and factor crossing.

The dot plot shows the coefficients of the liner model with formula: -logratio = (ln3 + cs3 + exp + #site_m + #endo_m + #site_s + p_ma + e_oe + ts_score)^2. The ^ operator extracts all eight factors as well as all possible combinations of second order interactions, such as ln3 * cs3 (ln3:cs3), ln3 * exp (ln3:exp), and so on. The size of dots indicates -log10p as the negation of the logarithm of p-values to base 10. Positive coefficients associate with miRNA down-regulation.


Leave a comment